ianslife ([info]jonnysfriendian) wrote,
@ 2004-05-11 22:00:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Why I hope they do not shut the Central Line again
There was a train derailment outside work today. It even made the national news. I barely noticed. I thought I'd be interested in having a national news story happen outside my window, but I only cared about my commute :).

Of course, that time the office all but emptied so people could cross the road to demonstrate for the boss the day he resigned I *was* interested in seeing the news happen outside my window.

Anyway, I digress. My main concern is that London Underground will not shut down the Central Line the way it did where there was a derailment near Chancery Lane. For if it does, on my back on the envelope calculations, they will kill a few dozen people indirectly, by moving them from the tube (not perfectly safe), to cars (which kill a few thousand people a year).

The problem is that people dwell on the high-profile deaths which happen when a public transport system has an accident, but take the steady stream of road deaths for granted.



(1 comment) - (Post a new comment)


[info]jonnynexus
2004-05-12 05:28 am UTC (link)
I agree that when it comes to extremely expensive ways of *improving* the basic safety threshold (such as the £17 million per death saved Advanced Train Protection system) then the money is better spent on road safety.

But when you have crashes (that never used to happen) occurring because they're not maintaining the track properly, then I think there is much more of a case to answer. (Of course the problem is that having badly skimped on maintenance before incidents, they then tend to totally over-react afterwards).

(Reply to this)


(1 comment) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…